<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~files/feed-premium.xsl"?>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:introParagraphLimit="2" xmlns:feedpress="https://feed.press/xmlns" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <feedpress:locale>en</feedpress:locale>
    <atom:link rel="hub" href="https://feedpress.superfeedr.com/"/>
    <title>
Comments for Worklaw</title>
    <atom:link href="https://feedpress.me/CommentsForJotwellWorklaw" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <link>https://worklaw.jotwell.com/</link>
    <description>The Journal of Things We Like (Lots)</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 11:23:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <sy:updatePeriod>
hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>
1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <item>
      <title>
Comment on Ignoring Part of the Supreme Court’s New Test on Worker Morale and Undue Hardship by Ultra_Vibe _BT</title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/16902/17300097/ignoring-part-of-the-supreme-courts-new-test-on-worker-morale-and-undue-hardship</link>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Ultra_Vibe _BT]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 11:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://worklaw.jotwell.com/?p=2155#comment-84687</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Oi galera!, vi um artigo sensacional sobre o último mod de Tomb Raider 2026. 
Estava procurando algo que roda liso no Android e este link me ajudou demais. 
 
Dêem uma olhada no que estão falando aqui: https://gravatar.com/exuberant155de5abc1  
 
O mod menu está completos e parece ser o mais rápido. Vale a pena conferir as novidades lá no site oficial da lara. 
 
Valeu!]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oi galera!, vi um artigo sensacional sobre o último mod de Tomb Raider 2026.<br />
Estava procurando algo que roda liso no Android e este link me ajudou demais. </p>
<p>Dêem uma olhada no que estão falando aqui: <a href="https://gravatar.com/exuberant155de5abc1" rel="nofollow ugc">https://gravatar.com/exuberant155de5abc1</a>  </p>
<p>O mod menu está completos e parece ser o mais rápido. Vale a pena conferir as novidades lá no site oficial da lara. </p>
<p>Valeu!</p>
<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/16902/17300097.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
Comment on Deciding Whether A Reasonable Jury Would Find Harassment Severe or Pervasive Enough by app đếm ngược giờ</title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/16902/17188596/deciding-whether-a-reasonable-jury-would-find-harassment-severe-or-pervasive-enough</link>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[app đếm ngược giờ]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2025 06:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://worklaw.jotwell.com/?p=2108#comment-80446</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[This study is a hoot! Who knew judges and juries had such different opinions on what constitutes severe or pervasive harassment? Its like theyre playing Name That Tune but with legal standards. The idea that judges are slicing and dicing evidence while juries see the big picture is both fascinating and slightly alarming. Its almost as if judges are trying to solve a puzzle with only half the pieces. But heres the kicker: what if the juries are just as clueless as the judges, but in a different way? And why do we even care if judges overrule meritorious claims anyway? Maybe we should just let the harassment fight to the finish, regardless of whos right. After all, its the legal equivalent of a reality show we cant look away from.

[This comment was edited to remove spam links]]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This study is a hoot! Who knew judges and juries had such different opinions on what constitutes severe or pervasive harassment? Its like theyre playing Name That Tune but with legal standards. The idea that judges are slicing and dicing evidence while juries see the big picture is both fascinating and slightly alarming. Its almost as if judges are trying to solve a puzzle with only half the pieces. But heres the kicker: what if the juries are just as clueless as the judges, but in a different way? And why do we even care if judges overrule meritorious claims anyway? Maybe we should just let the harassment fight to the finish, regardless of whos right. After all, its the legal equivalent of a reality show we cant look away from.</p>
<p>[This comment was edited to remove spam links]</p>
<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/16902/17188596.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
Comment on Beyond Collapse: Why Labor Law Probably Can’t End by đồng hồ đếm ngược 5 phút</title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/16902/17175186/beyond-collapse-why-labor-law-probably-cant-end</link>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[đồng hồ đếm ngược 5 phút]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 11:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://worklaw.jotwell.com/?p=2095#comment-79892</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Whoa, Prof. Velazquez might be aiming for a cliffhanger with the NLRA, but I think organized labor is just waiting for the Supreme Court to finally call its bluff. Six percent density? Maybe the NLRB needs a reality check, not a constitutional overhaul. As for Congress, well, they’ve been pretty busy lately, so don’t hold your breath. In the meantime, let’s hope the blue states start a labor law arms race—though I’m not betting on it. The only real counterinsurgency seems to be the ever-growing gap between the haves and have-nots. Keep watching the courts, though; this could get stranger than a union contract negotiation in D.C.

[This comment was edited to remove spam links]]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa, Prof. Velazquez might be aiming for a cliffhanger with the NLRA, but I think organized labor is just waiting for the Supreme Court to finally call its bluff. Six percent density? Maybe the NLRB needs a reality check, not a constitutional overhaul. As for Congress, well, they’ve been pretty busy lately, so don’t hold your breath. In the meantime, let’s hope the blue states start a labor law arms race—though I’m not betting on it. The only real counterinsurgency seems to be the ever-growing gap between the haves and have-nots. Keep watching the courts, though; this could get stranger than a union contract negotiation in D.C.</p>
<p>[This comment was edited to remove spam links]</p>
<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/16902/17175186.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
Comment on Two Frameworks for Employee Data Empowerment by Ifeoma Ajunwa</title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/16902/17106626/two-frameworks-for-employee-data-empowerment</link>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Ifeoma Ajunwa]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 18:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://worklaw.jotwell.com/?p=2093#comment-77177</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Thanks for this well- considered review of my piece. For those seeking more context: this piece was a further elucidation of a point I made in my book, &quot;The Quantified Worker.&quot; Currently, A.I. technologies allow for a greater quantification of the worker through indefatigable employer surveillance. But this quantification is not merely for present subordination of workers, rather the data derived from this new regime is the driving engine for the coming automation that will replace workers. My central argument is that workers should share in the profits as their  data is deployed to automate the workplace.]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this well- considered review of my piece. For those seeking more context: this piece was a further elucidation of a point I made in my book, &#8220;The Quantified Worker.&#8221; Currently, A.I. technologies allow for a greater quantification of the worker through indefatigable employer surveillance. But this quantification is not merely for present subordination of workers, rather the data derived from this new regime is the driving engine for the coming automation that will replace workers. My central argument is that workers should share in the profits as their  data is deployed to automate the workplace.</p>
<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/16902/17106626.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
Comment on Employer Catering to Discriminatory Harassment and Preferences by Influential Outsiders by Elza Bay</title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/16902/16671477/employer-catering-to-discriminatory-harassment-and-preferences-by-influential-outsiders</link>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Elza Bay]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 11:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://worklaw.jotwell.com/?p=1181#comment-63739</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Flake&#039;s article in the Boston College Law Review provides a thorough examination of employer liability for discrimination by non-employees, proposing a unified standard of reasonableness. By categorizing non-employee discrimination into distinct types, Flake offers a nuanced framework for understanding these challenges. While some may question the practicality of holding employers accountable for external actions, Flake&#039;s work sparks essential conversations about workplace inclusivity. It&#039;s a valuable contribution to employment law scholarship, offering both theoretical insights and practical considerations for real-world application, which could be beneficial for your UK dissertation on employment law.]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flake&#8217;s article in the Boston College Law Review provides a thorough examination of employer liability for discrimination by non-employees, proposing a unified standard of reasonableness. By categorizing non-employee discrimination into distinct types, Flake offers a nuanced framework for understanding these challenges. While some may question the practicality of holding employers accountable for external actions, Flake&#8217;s work sparks essential conversations about workplace inclusivity. It&#8217;s a valuable contribution to employment law scholarship, offering both theoretical insights and practical considerations for real-world application, which could be beneficial for your UK dissertation on employment law.</p>
<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/16902/16671477.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
Comment on Coercion in Labor Law: A Fresh Perspective by Adriana Garcia</title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/16902/16567983/coercion-in-labor-law-a-fresh-perspective</link>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Adriana Garcia]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2024 01:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://worklaw.jotwell.com/?p=1435#comment-62610</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://worklaw.jotwell.com/coercion-in-labor-law-a-fresh-perspective/#comment-57203&quot;&gt;Tony Egeberg&lt;/a&gt;.

With Covid I was not  employed, but not been in a labor union Company I feel inexperienced employees when promoted to Manager&#039;s lacking the supervisory skills could use what ever life skill or personality the person has will use it to extreme if ignorant.
I am a victim of a very young new Manager starting very subtle but to me scary so I am trying to educate myself to see if there is a solution.
I love your article.]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://worklaw.jotwell.com/coercion-in-labor-law-a-fresh-perspective/#comment-57203">Tony Egeberg</a>.</p>
<p>With Covid I was not  employed, but not been in a labor union Company I feel inexperienced employees when promoted to Manager&#8217;s lacking the supervisory skills could use what ever life skill or personality the person has will use it to extreme if ignorant.<br />
I am a victim of a very young new Manager starting very subtle but to me scary so I am trying to educate myself to see if there is a solution.<br />
I love your article.</p>
<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/16902/16567983.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
Comment on Identifying Racial Dimensions Within Contract Norms That May Coerce Black Workers by Michael Green</title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/16902/16146625/identifying-racial-dimensions-within-contract-norms-that-may-coerce-black-workers</link>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Green]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 13:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://worklaw.jotwell.com/?p=1865#comment-60949</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I am not sure I follow the point of your comment. But I invite you to read the article in the Pennsylvania law review. Thanks.]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure I follow the point of your comment. But I invite you to read the article in the Pennsylvania law review. Thanks.</p>
<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/16902/16146625.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
Comment on Identifying Racial Dimensions Within Contract Norms That May Coerce Black Workers by John Avery</title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/16902/16145643/identifying-racial-dimensions-within-contract-norms-that-may-coerce-black-workers</link>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[John Avery]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 23:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://worklaw.jotwell.com/?p=1865#comment-60946</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[It&#039;s hard to see the point of any of that. Is he suggesting people wouldn&#039;t have negotiated for their interests but for slavery? That&#039;s stupid.]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to see the point of any of that. Is he suggesting people wouldn&#8217;t have negotiated for their interests but for slavery? That&#8217;s stupid.</p>
<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/16902/16145643.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
Comment on Reworking Seminal Ideas of Employer Causation of Unlawful Anti-Union Discrimination by Joshua Rosenberg Daneri</title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/16902/15980072/reworking-seminal-ideas-of-employer-causation-of-unlawful-anti-union-discrimination</link>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Rosenberg Daneri]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2023 02:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://worklaw.jotwell.com/?p=1774#comment-60168</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The final version of the article is now available:

https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2567&#038;context=mjlr]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The final version of the article is now available:</p>
<p><a href="https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2567&#038;context=mjlr" rel="nofollow ugc">https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2567&#038;context=mjlr</a></p>
<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/16902/15980072.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>
Comment on Reworking Seminal Ideas of Employer Causation of Unlawful Anti-Union Discrimination by Joshua Rosenberg Daneri</title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/16902/15774620/reworking-seminal-ideas-of-employer-causation-of-unlawful-anti-union-discrimination</link>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Rosenberg Daneri]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 14:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://worklaw.jotwell.com/?p=1774#comment-58056</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Dear Prof. Duff,

We are grateful for your review of our article.  As to your disagreements on some of our points regarding causation, we welcome your feedback.  We still have time before MJLR sends the final proof to the publisher.

Sincerely,

Josh Rosenberg Daneri]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Prof. Duff,</p>
<p>We are grateful for your review of our article.  As to your disagreements on some of our points regarding causation, we welcome your feedback.  We still have time before MJLR sends the final proof to the publisher.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Josh Rosenberg Daneri</p>
<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/16902/15774620.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
