<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~files/feed-premium.xsl"?>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedpress="https://feed.press/xmlns" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <feedpress:locale>en</feedpress:locale>
    <atom:link rel="hub" href="https://feedpress.superfeedr.com/"/>
    <title>Paul Daly</title>
    <atom:link href="https://feedpress.me/administrativelawmatters" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <link>https://www.administrativelawmatters.com</link>
    <description>Administrative Law Matters</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 12:51:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <sy:updatePeriod>
hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>
1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <generator>ForceRouge0.9.85</generator>
    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Instruct, But Verify: AI and Workers&#8217; Compensation]]></title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17437309/instruct-but-verify-ai-and-workers-compensation</link>
      <comments>https://www.administrativelawmatters.com/blog/2026/09/02/instruct-but-verify-ai-and-workers-compensation/#respond</comments>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Daly]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 16:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://pauldaly.openum.ca/?p=7034</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[This is the text of my speaking remarks to the 42nd Annual Workers&#8217; Compensation Boards Conference in Quebec City last week. With thanks to Claude for helping to turn my dictated notes into the readable document you are about to review! I would like to begin with two vignettes, separated by about four years. Around [&#8230;]<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17437309.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <wfw:commentRss>https://www.administrativelawmatters.com/blog/2026/09/02/instruct-but-verify-ai-and-workers-compensation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Time Limits in Judicial Review: Robertson v. Rural Municipality of Murray Harbour, 2025 PESC 60]]></title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17435776/time-limits-in-judicial-review-robertson-v-rural-municipality-of-murray-harbour-2025-pesc-60</link>
      <comments>https://www.administrativelawmatters.com/blog/2026/08/31/time-limits-in-judicial-review-robertson-v-rural-municipality-of-murray-harbour-2025-pesc-60/#respond</comments>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Daly]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 18:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://pauldaly.openum.ca/?p=7030</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Judicial review applications have to be brought in a timely manner. As Lord Diplock explained, “public authorities and third parties should not be kept in suspense as to the legal validity [of a decision] for any longer period than is absolutely necessary in fairness to the person affected by the decision” (O’Reilly v Mackman [1983] [&#8230;]<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17435776.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <wfw:commentRss>https://www.administrativelawmatters.com/blog/2026/08/31/time-limits-in-judicial-review-robertson-v-rural-municipality-of-murray-harbour-2025-pesc-60/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[New Issues on Judicial Review: Judiciously Exercising Discretion]]></title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17426907/new-issues-on-judicial-review-judiciously-exercising-discretion</link>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Daly]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 17:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://pauldaly.openum.ca/?p=7001</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[This is my third and final post on new issues on judicial review &#8212; see here and here for the previous posts. I am not suggesting that it is somehow open season for applicants or appellants to raise new issues before the courts. The underlying rationales identified by Rothstein J in Alberta Teachers will continue to help [&#8230;]<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17426907.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[When is a &#8220;Decision&#8221; Made? Kensington Co-operative Association Limited v Profitt, Workers Compensation Appeal Tribunal and Workers Compensation Board PEI, 2026 PECA 9 and R (Bano) v. London Borough of Waltham Forest, [2026] UKSC 22]]></title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17426901/when-is-a-decision-made-kensington-co-operative-association-limited-v-profitt-workers-compensation-appeal-tribunal-and-workers-compensation-board-pei-2026-peca-9-and-r-bano-v-london-borough</link>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Daly]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 17:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://pauldaly.openum.ca/?p=7022</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[A pair of interesting cases, one from Canada and one from England, deals with the unusual &#8212; but highly consequential &#8212; issue of identifying the time at which an administrative &#8220;decision&#8221; is made. In each case, the bottom-line result is quite harsh on the individual claiming no &#8220;decision&#8221; had been made and, in very different [&#8230;]<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17426901.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[New Issues on Judicial Review: Liberally Exercising Discretion on Legal Issues]]></title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17418514/new-issues-on-judicial-review-liberally-exercising-discretion-on-legal-issues</link>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Daly]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 20:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://pauldaly.openum.ca/?p=6999</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[This is my second post in my &#8216;new issues&#8217; series: the first post can be accessed here. There is an instructive discussion in a recent Federal Court of Appeal case. In Canada (Attorney General) v. Medline Canada Corporation, 2026 FCA 74, the Attorney General had appealed from a decision of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal. [&#8230;]<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17418514.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Technical Issues with Posts]]></title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17404038/technical-issues-with-posts</link>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Daly]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 21:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://pauldaly.openum.ca/?p=7015</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I am aware of a technical issue with posts on the blog. Sometimes the text does not appear. The tech team is working on a solution. In the meantime, a simple workaround is to refresh the page once you have landed on it. The text is all there in the system, there is just a [&#8230;]<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17404038.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[The Supreme Court of Canada&#8217;s Decision in the Democracy Watch case: Democracy Watch v. Canada (Attorney General), 2026 SCC 28]]></title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17396521/the-supreme-court-of-canadas-decision-in-the-democracy-watch-case-democracy-watch-v-canada-attorney-general-2026-scc-28</link>
      <comments>https://www.administrativelawmatters.com/blog/2026/07/30/the-supreme-court-of-canadas-decision-in-the-democracy-watch-case-democracy-watch-v-canada-attorney-general-2026-scc-28/#comments</comments>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Daly]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 17:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://pauldaly.openum.ca/?p=7005</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[This morning the Supreme Court of Canada unanimously allowed the appeal in Democracy Watch v. Canada (Attorney General), 2026 SCC 28. With Sujit Choudhry, I represented the appellant. This is an extremely consequential decision, clarifying the constitutional basis of judicial review of administrative action in Canada and reasserting settled principles in relation to adequate alternative [&#8230;]<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17396521.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <wfw:commentRss>https://www.administrativelawmatters.com/blog/2026/07/30/the-supreme-court-of-canadas-decision-in-the-democracy-watch-case-democracy-watch-v-canada-attorney-general-2026-scc-28/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[New Issues on Judicial Review: Principled and Practical Justifications]]></title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17388108/new-issues-on-judicial-review-principled-and-practical-justifications</link>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Daly]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 12:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://pauldaly.openum.ca/?p=6983</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[This is the first in a series of posts about raising new issues on judicial review. A court &#8220;has a discretion not to consider an issue raised for the first time on judicial review where it would be inappropriate to do so&#8221; (Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v. Alberta Teachers&#8217; Association, 2011 SCC 61, [2011] [&#8230;]<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17388108.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Yves-Marie Morissette, positivisme, antipositivisme, et droit administratif&#160;: synthèse]]></title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17386907/yves-marie-morissette-positivisme-antipositivisme-et-droit-administratif-synthese</link>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Daly]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 20:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://pauldaly.openum.ca/?p=6977</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[This is the final part of my piece on Justice Morissette Nous avons établi une thèse positiviste et une antithèse antipositiviste. Y-a-t-il, possiblement, une synthèse? Ma réponse à cette question est positive, ancrée dans la réalité que, dans le système juridique, peu de questions sont véritablement apodictiques. En fait, selon ma synthèse, la légitimité des [&#8230;]<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17386907.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Yves-Marie Morissette, positivisme, antipositivisme, et droit administratif&#160;: antithèse]]></title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17381893/yves-marie-morissette-positivisme-antipositivisme-et-droit-administratif-antithese</link>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Daly]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 14:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://pauldaly.openum.ca/?p=6975</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[This is part three of my piece on Justice Morissette Cette conception positiviste du droit administratif a même été traduite au droit administratif en 2013 par la Cour suprême du Canada dans un litige nommé McLean concernant l’interprétation de la loi habilitante d’une Commission des valeurs mobilières : L’élément décisif en l’espèce réside dans le privilège [&#8230;]<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17381893.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
