<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~files/feed-premium.xsl"?>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedpress="https://feed.press/xmlns" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <feedpress:locale>en</feedpress:locale>
    <atom:link rel="hub" href="https://feedpress.superfeedr.com/"/>
    <title>Paul Daly</title>
    <atom:link href="https://feedpress.me/administrativelawmatters" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <link>https://www.administrativelawmatters.com</link>
    <description>Administrative Law Matters</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 17:41:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <sy:updatePeriod>
hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>
1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <generator>ForceRouge0.9.85</generator>
    
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[New Issues on Judicial Review: Judiciously Exercising Discretion]]></title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17426907/new-issues-on-judicial-review-judiciously-exercising-discretion</link>
      <comments>https://www.administrativelawmatters.com/blog/2026/08/23/new-issues-on-judicial-review-judiciously-exercising-discretion/#respond</comments>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Daly]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 17:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://pauldaly.openum.ca/?p=7001</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[This is my third and final post on new issues on judicial review &#8212; see here and here for the previous posts. I am not suggesting that it is somehow open season for applicants or appellants to raise new issues before the courts. The underlying rationales identified by Rothstein J in Alberta Teachers will continue to help [&#8230;]<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17426907.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <wfw:commentRss>https://www.administrativelawmatters.com/blog/2026/08/23/new-issues-on-judicial-review-judiciously-exercising-discretion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[When is a &#8220;Decision&#8221; Made? Kensington Co-operative Association Limited v Profitt, Workers Compensation Appeal Tribunal and Workers Compensation Board PEI, 2026 PECA 9 and R (Bano) v. London Borough of Waltham Forest, [2026] UKSC 22]]></title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17426901/when-is-a-decision-made-kensington-co-operative-association-limited-v-profitt-workers-compensation-appeal-tribunal-and-workers-compensation-board-pei-2026-peca-9-and-r-bano-v-london-borough</link>
      <comments>https://www.administrativelawmatters.com/blog/2026/08/23/when-is-a-decision-made-kensington-co-operative-association-limited-v-profitt-workers-compensation-appeal-tribunal-and-workers-compensation-board-pei-2026-peca-9-and-r-bano-v-london-borough/#respond</comments>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Daly]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 17:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://pauldaly.openum.ca/?p=7022</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[A pair of interesting cases, one from Canada and one from England, deals with the unusual &#8212; but highly consequential &#8212; issue of identifying the time at which an administrative &#8220;decision&#8221; is made. In each case, the bottom-line result is quite harsh on the individual claiming no &#8220;decision&#8221; had been made and, in very different [&#8230;]<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17426901.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <wfw:commentRss>https://www.administrativelawmatters.com/blog/2026/08/23/when-is-a-decision-made-kensington-co-operative-association-limited-v-profitt-workers-compensation-appeal-tribunal-and-workers-compensation-board-pei-2026-peca-9-and-r-bano-v-london-borough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[New Issues on Judicial Review: Liberally Exercising Discretion on Legal Issues]]></title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17418514/new-issues-on-judicial-review-liberally-exercising-discretion-on-legal-issues</link>
      <comments>https://www.administrativelawmatters.com/blog/2026/08/14/new-issues-on-judicial-review-liberally-exercising-discretion-on-legal-issues/#respond</comments>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Daly]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 20:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://pauldaly.openum.ca/?p=6999</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[This is my second post in my &#8216;new issues&#8217; series: the first post can be accessed here. There is an instructive discussion in a recent Federal Court of Appeal case. In Canada (Attorney General) v. Medline Canada Corporation, 2026 FCA 74, the Attorney General had appealed from a decision of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal. [&#8230;]<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17418514.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <wfw:commentRss>https://www.administrativelawmatters.com/blog/2026/08/14/new-issues-on-judicial-review-liberally-exercising-discretion-on-legal-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Technical Issues with Posts]]></title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17404038/technical-issues-with-posts</link>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Daly]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 21:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://pauldaly.openum.ca/?p=7015</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I am aware of a technical issue with posts on the blog. Sometimes the text does not appear. The tech team is working on a solution. In the meantime, a simple workaround is to refresh the page once you have landed on it. The text is all there in the system, there is just a [&#8230;]<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17404038.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[The Supreme Court of Canada&#8217;s Decision in the Democracy Watch case: Democracy Watch v. Canada (Attorney General), 2026 SCC 28]]></title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17396521/the-supreme-court-of-canadas-decision-in-the-democracy-watch-case-democracy-watch-v-canada-attorney-general-2026-scc-28</link>
      <comments>https://www.administrativelawmatters.com/blog/2026/07/30/the-supreme-court-of-canadas-decision-in-the-democracy-watch-case-democracy-watch-v-canada-attorney-general-2026-scc-28/#comments</comments>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Daly]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 17:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://pauldaly.openum.ca/?p=7005</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[This morning the Supreme Court of Canada unanimously allowed the appeal in Democracy Watch v. Canada (Attorney General), 2026 SCC 28. With Sujit Choudhry, I represented the appellant. This is an extremely consequential decision, clarifying the constitutional basis of judicial review of administrative action in Canada and reasserting settled principles in relation to adequate alternative [&#8230;]<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17396521.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <wfw:commentRss>https://www.administrativelawmatters.com/blog/2026/07/30/the-supreme-court-of-canadas-decision-in-the-democracy-watch-case-democracy-watch-v-canada-attorney-general-2026-scc-28/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[New Issues on Judicial Review: Principled and Practical Justifications]]></title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17388108/new-issues-on-judicial-review-principled-and-practical-justifications</link>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Daly]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 12:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://pauldaly.openum.ca/?p=6983</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[This is the first in a series of posts about raising new issues on judicial review. A court &#8220;has a discretion not to consider an issue raised for the first time on judicial review where it would be inappropriate to do so&#8221; (Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v. Alberta Teachers&#8217; Association, 2011 SCC 61, [2011] [&#8230;]<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17388108.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Yves-Marie Morissette, positivisme, antipositivisme, et droit administratif&#160;: synthèse]]></title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17386907/yves-marie-morissette-positivisme-antipositivisme-et-droit-administratif-synthese</link>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Daly]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 20:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://pauldaly.openum.ca/?p=6977</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[This is the final part of my piece on Justice Morissette Nous avons établi une thèse positiviste et une antithèse antipositiviste. Y-a-t-il, possiblement, une synthèse? Ma réponse à cette question est positive, ancrée dans la réalité que, dans le système juridique, peu de questions sont véritablement apodictiques. En fait, selon ma synthèse, la légitimité des [&#8230;]<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17386907.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Yves-Marie Morissette, positivisme, antipositivisme, et droit administratif&#160;: antithèse]]></title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17381893/yves-marie-morissette-positivisme-antipositivisme-et-droit-administratif-antithese</link>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Daly]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 14:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://pauldaly.openum.ca/?p=6975</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[This is part three of my piece on Justice Morissette Cette conception positiviste du droit administratif a même été traduite au droit administratif en 2013 par la Cour suprême du Canada dans un litige nommé McLean concernant l’interprétation de la loi habilitante d’une Commission des valeurs mobilières : L’élément décisif en l’espèce réside dans le privilège [&#8230;]<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17381893.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Yves-Marie Morissette, positivisme, antipositivisme, et droit administratif&#160;: thèse]]></title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17380716/yves-marie-morissette-positivisme-antipositivisme-et-droit-administratif-these</link>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Daly]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 13:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://pauldaly.openum.ca/?p=6973</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[This is part two of my piece on Justice Morissette Au cœur de la thèse Morissettienne est la décision de la Cour suprême du Canada dans SCFP,[1] dont l’importance fondamentale est la reconnaissance formelle du caractère essentiellement indéterminée du droit statutaire. Cependant, pour bien saisir la pertinence de la décision, il faut connaître un peu [&#8230;]<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17380716.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[New Course: The Law of Economic Regulation]]></title>
      <link>https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17379542/new-course-the-law-of-economic-regulation</link>
      <comments>https://www.administrativelawmatters.com/blog/2026/07/13/new-course-the-law-of-economic-regulation/#comments</comments>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Daly]]></dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 14:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://pauldaly.openum.ca/?p=6969</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[This Fall I am teaching a new course on advanced administrative law at the University of Ottawa. Here is the overview and course outline. Advanced Administrative Law (The Law of Economic Regulation) Paul Daly Fall 2026 Overview Students in this course learn the legal principles relating to the regulation of economic activity in Canada. We [&#8230;]<img src="https://feedpress.me/link/23684/17379542.gif" height="1" width="1"/>]]></description>
      <wfw:commentRss>https://www.administrativelawmatters.com/blog/2026/07/13/new-course-the-law-of-economic-regulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
