(Credit: mark reinstein/Shutterstock)
PHILADELPHIA — In an eye-opening study that bridges America’s complicated history with its present-day power structures, researchers have uncovered a startling connection between slaveholder ancestry and the current wealth of U.S. Congress members. This revelation not only sheds light on the long-reaching ties of slavery’s economic impact but also raises profound questions about the persistence of privilege and the nature of generational wealth in America.
The study, published in PLOS ONE, examined all 535 members of the 117th Congress, comparing the net worth of those with slaveholding ancestors to those without. The results are eye-opening: legislators whose ancestors owned 16 or more slaves have an average net worth nearly $4 million higher than their colleagues without slaveholding ancestors, even after accounting for factors like age, race, and education.
This finding comes at a time when discussions about racial equity, reparations, and the long-term consequences of slavery are at the forefront of national discourse. It provides concrete evidence that the economic advantages gained through slavery continue to reverberate through American society more than 150 years after emancipation.
The researchers, Neil K. R. Sehgal and Ashwini R. Sehgal, embarked on this study to explore a question that has long puzzled historians and economists: how much does America’s slave-owning past influence today’s social and economic landscape? While previous studies have examined this question at county or state levels, this is the first to draw a direct line from individual slaveholders to their descendants’ current wealth.
To conduct their analysis, the researchers leveraged a unique dataset. They combined financial disclosures required of all Congress members with a meticulous genealogical investigation by Reuters that identified which legislators had slaveholding ancestors and how many individuals those ancestors enslaved.
The results paint a stark picture of wealth disparity. The median net worth across all 535 Congress members was $1.28 million. However, legislators whose ancestors enslaved 16 or more people had a median net worth of $5.62 million – more than five times the overall average.
The study’s findings challenge the notion that the economic impacts of slavery dissipated quickly after emancipation. Instead, they suggest that the wealth generated through slave labor has been remarkably durable, passing down through generations and manifesting today in the halls of America’s highest legislative body.
It’s important to note that the study doesn’t suggest current legislators bear personal responsibility for their ancestors’ actions. Rather, it illuminates the long-term, systemic ways that wealth and privilege can be transmitted across generations.
This transmission occurs through various mechanisms: inheritance laws, access to elite educational institutions, entry into prestigious occupations, and the ability to influence political and economic systems to maintain advantages. The researchers found that the wealth gap was particularly pronounced among White legislators. When looking only at White members of Congress, those with ancestors who owned 16 or more slaves had a net worth $3.41 million higher than their counterparts without slaveholding ancestry.
This study comes at a crucial moment in American history, as the nation grapples with persistent racial wealth gaps and debates the merits of reparations for slavery. The findings provide empirical evidence that the economic legacy of slavery continues to shape American society in tangible ways, even at the highest levels of government.
Moreover, the research raises important questions about representation and policy-making. If a significant portion of Congress members benefit from generational wealth rooted in slavery, how might that influence their perspectives on economic policies, racial justice initiatives, or reparations proposals?
The study also highlights the importance of understanding history’s long-term impacts. While it’s easy to think of slavery as a distant past, these findings show how its economic repercussions may be rippling through time, potentially shaping opportunities and outcomes for individuals and families generations later.
It’s crucial to emphasize that this study focuses on correlation, not causation. The researchers can’t definitively say that slaveholding ancestry directly caused the observed wealth disparities. Other factors, such as regional economic differences or family traditions of political involvement, could also play a role.
Nevertheless, the stark wealth gap uncovered by this research provides compelling evidence that the economic advantages gained through slavery have been remarkably persistent. It challenges us to think critically about the nature of generational wealth, the long-term consequences of historical injustices, and what steps may help create a more equitable society.
“Members of Congress hold significant power to shape policies and set national agendas. Understanding the wealth disparities within this influential group can drive conversations about economic equity and motivate legislators to support policies addressing historical injustices,” the researchers conclude in a media release.
Paper Summary
Methodology
The researchers collected financial disclosure data for all 535 members of the 117th U.S. Congress as of April 15, 2021. They estimated each legislator’s net worth by subtracting total liabilities from total assets. Information on slaveholder ancestry came from a Reuters investigative series that used historical documents and genealogist verification to identify which Congress members had slaveholding ancestors and how many people those ancestors enslaved. The researchers then used statistical techniques to analyze the relationship between slaveholder ancestry and current net worth, while accounting for other factors like age, sex, race, ethnicity, and education.
Key Results
The study found that the median net worth of all Congress members was $1.28 million. However, legislators whose ancestors enslaved 16 or more people had a median net worth of $5.62 million. After adjusting for other factors, these legislators had a net worth $3.93 million higher than those without slaveholding ancestors. This relationship held true even when the analysis was limited to only White legislators. The study also found that net worth was associated with increased age and White race.
Study Limitations
The study has several limitations. First, it focused only on members of Congress, who are generally wealthier than the average American, so the results may not apply to the general population. Second, the analysis of slaveholder ancestry was limited to post-1776 slavery in the United States, potentially missing earlier or international slaveholding. Third, financial disclosures have some limitations in accurately capturing net worth. Fourth, the relatively small sample size resulted in wide confidence intervals. Finally, the study can’t prove a causal relationship between slaveholder ancestry and current wealth.
Discussion & Takeaways
This study provides evidence that the economic advantages of slaveholding may persist for generations. It highlights the durability of wealth across time and the various mechanisms through which privilege can be maintained. The findings are consistent with other research on intergenerational wealth transfer but provide a unique perspective by directly linking slaveholder ancestry to current wealth. The study raises important questions about the long-term impacts of historical injustices and the nature of economic inequality in America. However, the researchers caution against extrapolating these results to all Americans and emphasize the need for further research to understand how slaveholder ancestry affects wealth in the general population.
Funding & Disclosures
The authors received no specific funding for this work and declared no competing interests.
publish the list or table identifying which legislators this study suggests benefited from their familial legacy based in slavery. Correlating that data with their policy positions and legislative record would be of some interest. For all we know, some could be among the most liberal members, but it seems more likely most or all are quite conservative or support Trump.
Shocker. The landed aristocracy comprises the ruling class.
And, oh by the way, they also owned slaves.
The really troubling aspect is that Congress is not more egalitarian.
The study left out one tiny detail.
Of the 535 members of congress
how many had ancestors with more than 16 slaves?
“The researchers can’t definitively say that slaveholding ancestry directly caused the observed wealth disparities” BUT the entire point of the article is to state that owning slaves did cause the disparity.
Yes,I agree and saw the desparities in stately homes and possessions in which I surmise the wealth was making it’s rounds to families.this was back in the 60’s.Stately homes,new cars,swimming pools,boats,and businesses that these people owned.the minority are so far behind in this wealth gap it would take 50 years to catch up.sure after salvery and freedom they got job in the industrial movement and we’re able to buy cheap homes and an automobile to drive to work.few and far in between some had wealth but we’re run out of town or businesses we’re burned doŵn.( Black Wall Street) as example….new money is mostly made by entertainers sports figures,political figures some business owners.like I said it would take years to catch up with the Wealth gap.
Unless the math is misstated, the inclusion of non-white members of congress actually drives UP the differential. Does this mean the non-white members whose ancestors owned 16 or more slaves are actually richer on average than the comparable white members?
What the study does not discuss is the net worth of other decedents from those same 16+ slaveowners. Most certainly there are distant cousins that haven’t fared as well.
You know it was democrats that were the beneficiaries because we would know their names if they were republicans.
So privileged member of Congress should pay for reparations, not taxpayer.
My thought exactly!
Start the study with your conclusion, then go find a way to make numbers fit into your supposition
.
So Clinton, Biden, Obama, Pelosi all had slaveholder past?
Thanks for the study… illuminating
I am curious as to which members have ties to slavery. How many black members ancestors owned slaves? Full disclosure please.