law world environmental regulation

(Credit: Deemerwha studio/Shutterstock)

LONDON — As the world grapples with climate change and environmental calamities, a new survey is revealing a surprising shift in public opinion. It turns out that most people around the globe now want to see serious, criminal consequences for those who harm the planet.

Imagine if damaging the environment was treated like a serious crime, right up there with theft or fraud. Well, that’s exactly what a whopping 72% of people across 18 major countries want to see happen. This eye-opening finding comes from the Global Commons Survey 2024, a massive research project that took the pulse of 22,000 people across some of the world’s biggest economies.

So, what does this actually mean? Researchers are talking about making it a criminal offense for government officials or corporate executives to give the green light to actions that seriously harm nature or the climate. Think of it as putting Mother Nature under legal protection.

“The majority support (72%) for criminalizing actions which allow serious damage to the climate surprised us,” admits Owen Gaffney, who helps lead an initiative called Earth4All, in a media release.

It’s a clear signal that people are fed up with environmental destruction and want to see real accountability.

Nearly three out of four people (72%) across 18 G20 countries support making it a criminal offence for government or leaders of large businesses to approve or permit actions which cause serious damage to nature and climate
Nearly three out of four people (72%) across 18 G20 countries support making it a criminal offense for government or leaders of large businesses to approve or permit actions which cause serious damage to nature and climate (Credit: Earth4All / GCA)

Poll reveals a growing movement

This isn’t just pie-in-the-sky thinking. Some countries are already making moves in this direction. Belgium, for instance, recently made “ecocide” a federal crime. If you’re scratching your head wondering what ecocide means, think of it as a fancy term for severely damaging the environment. It’s like genocide, but for ecosystems instead of people.

Belgium isn’t alone. France and Chile have passed similar laws, while countries like Brazil, Italy, and the Netherlands are considering jumping on the bandwagon. It’s like a domino effect of environmental protection laws spreading across the globe.

worried young woman holding up a stop climate change sign
72% said they want to make it a criminal offense for government officials or corporate executives to give the green light to actions that seriously harm nature or the climate. (© Carlo – stock.adobe.com)

The survey paints a picture of a world that’s both deeply concerned about the state of our planet and hopeful for change. Here are some key findings that might raise your eyebrows:

  • Nearly 6 in 10 people (59%) are seriously worried about the current state of nature.
  • An even bigger group – 69% – think we’re approaching some scary “tipping points” for climate and nature due to human activities. These tipping points are like environmental points of no return, where damage becomes irreversible.
  • On the brighter side, 61% of people fall into groups that strongly support taking action to protect the environment.

“People everywhere are very worried about the state of our planet and they’re feeling the pain already,” says Jane Madgwick, who heads up the Global Commons Alliance.

However, Madgwick also sees a path forward, emphasizing the need for “bold leadership and a truly global effort” to tackle these challenges.

Women driving fears about climate

Interestingly, the survey found that women tend to be more concerned about environmental issues than men. They’re more worried about the state of nature today and for future generations. Women are also less likely to think that claims about environmental risks are exaggerated or that technology alone can solve our problems without lifestyle changes.

The survey also revealed some stark differences between developed and developing countries. People in countries like India, China, and Indonesia feel much more personally exposed to climate change compared to those living in Europe and the United States.

This makes sense when you think about it. Many developing countries are on the front lines of climate change, facing more frequent and severe natural disasters, rising sea levels, and extreme weather events. It’s no wonder they’re feeling the heat (literally and figuratively) more acutely.

What does all this mean for the future?

Jojo Mehta, who leads an organization called Stop Ecocide International, sees these survey results as a sign of growing momentum. She points out that we’re already seeing “significant policy shifts in favor of ecocide legislation” at various levels of government. Mehta believes this push is being driven by widespread demand from regular, everyday people.

“People clearly understand that the most severe forms of environmental destruction harm all of us,” Mehta explains.

The idea is that by making top decision-makers personally liable for environmental crimes, we can prevent damage before it happens. As we look to the future, it’s clear that the tide of public opinion is turning in many countries.

The question now is: will leaders and policymakers worldwide listen and take action?

About StudyFinds Staff

StudyFinds sets out to find new research that speaks to mass audiences — without all the scientific jargon. The stories we publish are digestible, summarized versions of research that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. StudyFinds Staff articles are AI assisted, but always thoroughly reviewed and edited by a Study Finds staff member. Read our AI Policy for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply

16 Comments

  1. jack says:

    If the 72% were successful in getting jail time for those that damage the climate, they would all wind up in jail. Do you know how much plastic, carbon emissions, and poop an average person adds to the environment? And if they have children, they’re definitely going to jail. There is nothing more damaging one can to do the climate than to have children.

  2. BoonieRatBob says:

    AGW is a $CAM . CO2 is Plant Food . Climate Change is a Natural Repeating Cycle .

  3. Bill Mastrigt says:

    Fart and go to jail.

  4. JohnD says:

    Life sentences in federal prisons for “Stop Oil” protesters.

  5. Joe Bennigan says:

    Lets put Biden/Harris in jail for their open border policy allowing third world immigrants to come in and destroy our planet with their exponentially enlarged carbin footprint.

  6. Puddin Tame says:

    Thank goodness finally a call to respect all life and stop all wars. Why are we sorting our rubbish when others are dropping bombs? Save our world by eliminating chemical warfare and actually create viable and sustainable ways to settle disagreements. We do need to work together as a collective and stop tolerating funding the destruction of our planet in the form of weaponry. Wait, that idea will prevent some companies based on distributing destructive devices from turning a profit and hurting 401 k’s and not to mention stocks.
    Oh the humanity!
    Yep, I’m a woman.

  7. chas morris says:

    What about the occasional Volcano?

  8. Stark says:

    Let’s start with the ones calling for jail time for their “carbon footprints” that have gone unpaid.

  9. Pete says:

    Leave the planet alone! It is in charge, NOT us!

  10. Howard says:

    The worlds worst polluters will simply destroy any competition from any entity that subscribe this nonsense

  11. Doog Gray says:

    For starters, how about over fishing; Chinese boats by the scores off the coast of Ecuador?

  12. Michael F says:

    How about jail time for the corporations and governments that use this naturally occurring event into huge profits through junk science scare tactics!

  13. Pieter Verasdonck says:

    Great study! We are in danger of flushing baby with bathwater. Humanity is co-dependent on viable nature, and population has grown to the point laws are needed to economise. Around 300% of land and water is now wasted, and vital wilderness eradicated. Together we are reaching a threshold: Earth resources are limited. Eviction is adapting successfully. Charge Earth Care as part of product footprint price. Footprint laws for non eco-friendly purchases. See:
    htt.ps://sustainablelifestylehub.org/2024/08/04/why-ahimsa-non-violence-laws/

    1. Eddie says:

      So who decides who lives and who dies to save the planet. Idiot…

    2. FF says:

      The climate changes all the time: winter, spring , summer, fall.
      Man cannot control it.
      The Lord God who created the heavens, the earth and the seas and everything living has established it.
      The book of Genesis chapter 8

  14. Joe Cotter says:

    how is it possible that so many ignorant people can make it through the day without injuring themselves? not one of those surveyed can define “climate change.”